Should we continue to let mad scientists and technocrats control the weather, or not? The arguments supporting geoengineering involve deliberately manipulating Earth's climate systems to counteract other occurring effects of climate change supposedly. Have you ever heard of this controversial topic before? Debates on geoengineering range from its secrecy and genuine intentions to its unintended consequences and potential global governance issues. People who know nothing about geoengineering yet gripe about climate change are truly missing half the picture. The subjects most threatening to those in power are usually the most censored and obfuscated. Most people never heard of it; others tend only to believe it if the Weather Channel says it, and so forth, as if mainstream media doesn't have a controlled agenda or the military doesn't have its top-secret projects; Yeah, right.

Believing that all jet trails are "contrails" is the equivalent of seeing your breath as a large cloud that continues to accumulate rather than quickly dissipate or linger as a lasting trail behind you. It doesn't matter how cold it is or what altitude, that never happens. Critically observe the shy for yourself: How wide does a CHEMTRAIL, "contrail," have to spread out before you mistakenly call it a cloud?...

The existence of this issue is not up for debate. The only honest discussion is whether we should continue letting governments and corporations modify the weather, especially when there has been no informed consent and no ingredient list presented to us. I am writing this not to argue with the shills who divulge such disinformation but as a countermeasure to inform those unaware or on the fence. Please come to your own conclusions. God bless humanity.

Source Material and Special Thanks:

Even Bob Ross knows that real happy little clouds
don’t come in straight fucking lines.

SHOW THE WORLD YOU TRULY CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT;
PURCHASE AN ARTISTIC RIBBON FOR GEOENGINEERING AWARENESS TODAY!